|photo by yusunkwon, CC license|
An interesting article from Ars Technica brings up the idea of using microblogging as a part of classes. Though I havn’t tried it, Twitter seems to be a useless application. Why would I want to talk about what I am doing in 140 characters? And why would people care? Yet, as I think more deeply about its possibilities I begin to see some possible uses. Dorothea Salo has said she has seen reference questions passed around and answered fairly quickly on Twitter networks. Twitter also seems very similar to Facebook’s “status” feature. This can be useful to see what people are up to, how they are feeling, and the like. It can be a very useful social tool for communicating your feelings or exploits or knowing others. It is much easier to read than mannerisms or body language.
It was fascinating to see that students Twittering away outside of class were able to bond better as a community in class. I think this is similar to discussion boards on courseware but much quicker and sexier. I have actually used blogs in multiple class settings and thought it was somewhat useful. You could subscribe to your classmates blog and read their posts on the reading or different questions that came up. The only problem with this is length. Students already have enough reading as it is. Reading 10-20 or more blog posts is just asking too much. The outside of classroom discussion is very useful but is difficult to do in addition to all the other class work. A solution could be limiting blog posts to one short or medium length paragraph and then have longer discussions in the comments. Another good possibility is something like Twitter. With only a few characters to get your message across, the Twitter posts would not be a chore to read or write.
I guess I am starting to see the utility of something like Twitter after all. Maybe I’ll try it out. Are there any other Twitter uses that I have left out? Is microblogging an effective tool for classroom communication?