<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Ideas: Separating The Chaff From The Grain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andyburkhardt.com/2011/01/25/new-ideas-separating-the-chaff-from-the-grain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andyburkhardt.com/2011/01/25/new-ideas-separating-the-chaff-from-the-grain/</link>
	<description>Top of the Information Food Chain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: If at first&#8230; &#124; Chasing Reference</title>
		<link>http://andyburkhardt.com/2011/01/25/new-ideas-separating-the-chaff-from-the-grain/comment-page-1/#comment-2856</link>
		<dc:creator>If at first&#8230; &#124; Chasing Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andyburkhardt.com/?p=1392#comment-2856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in terms of library initiatives.  Andy Burkhardt encourages librarians to take risks and try new programs despite uncertainty.  Meredith Farkas wrote a great two-part series earlier this year about [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in terms of library initiatives.  Andy Burkhardt encourages librarians to take risks and try new programs despite uncertainty.  Meredith Farkas wrote a great two-part series earlier this year about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Things that have gotten me thinking this week &#124; Matt Phillips</title>
		<link>http://andyburkhardt.com/2011/01/25/new-ideas-separating-the-chaff-from-the-grain/comment-page-1/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Things that have gotten me thinking this week &#124; Matt Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andyburkhardt.com/?p=1392#comment-947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] New Ideas: Separating The Chaff From The Grain [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Ideas: Separating The Chaff From The Grain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesday = Data! #libday6 &#171; lyndamk</title>
		<link>http://andyburkhardt.com/2011/01/25/new-ideas-separating-the-chaff-from-the-grain/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday = Data! #libday6 &#171; lyndamk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andyburkhardt.com/?p=1392#comment-944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] New Ideas: Separating the Chaff from the Grain [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Ideas: Separating the Chaff from the Grain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Burkhardt</title>
		<link>http://andyburkhardt.com/2011/01/25/new-ideas-separating-the-chaff-from-the-grain/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Burkhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andyburkhardt.com/?p=1392#comment-943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe, I agree that additional scrutiny is what polishes ideas and makes them stronger, and it&#039;s necessary. I think that is Meredith&#039;s point in her post about devil&#039;s advocates. Subjecting an idea to criticism can test if it has value.

What I&#039;m thinking about though, is the environment in which new ideas are brought forward. If it&#039;s a positive environment where criticism occurs because everyone genuinely wants to make the ideas better, there will likely be a lot more new ideas. But if it&#039;s a negative environment in which people constantly criticize, not to make ideas better, but out of fear or uncertainty about the future or because they dislike someone or whatever, then people will be less likely to put forward new ideas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I agree that additional scrutiny is what polishes ideas and makes them stronger, and it&#8217;s necessary. I think that is Meredith&#8217;s point in her post about devil&#8217;s advocates. Subjecting an idea to criticism can test if it has value.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m thinking about though, is the environment in which new ideas are brought forward. If it&#8217;s a positive environment where criticism occurs because everyone genuinely wants to make the ideas better, there will likely be a lot more new ideas. But if it&#8217;s a negative environment in which people constantly criticize, not to make ideas better, but out of fear or uncertainty about the future or because they dislike someone or whatever, then people will be less likely to put forward new ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe grobelny</title>
		<link>http://andyburkhardt.com/2011/01/25/new-ideas-separating-the-chaff-from-the-grain/comment-page-1/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>joe grobelny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andyburkhardt.com/?p=1392#comment-942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It could die, or additional scrutiny can lead to the polishing it needs.The peasant&#039;s concerns about their crops being stolen was a matter of life and death, which is frankly, legitimate give the context of agricultural societies. Medival China or in the context of Mao&#039;s rule, such concerns are utterly valid and Kelly glosses on the context to make his point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could die, or additional scrutiny can lead to the polishing it needs.The peasant&#8217;s concerns about their crops being stolen was a matter of life and death, which is frankly, legitimate give the context of agricultural societies. Medival China or in the context of Mao&#8217;s rule, such concerns are utterly valid and Kelly glosses on the context to make his point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention New Ideas: Separating The Chaff From The Grain &#124; Information Tyrannosaur -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://andyburkhardt.com/2011/01/25/new-ideas-separating-the-chaff-from-the-grain/comment-page-1/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention New Ideas: Separating The Chaff From The Grain &#124; Information Tyrannosaur -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andyburkhardt.com/?p=1392#comment-941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bobbi Newman, Andy Burkhardt. Andy Burkhardt said: Blog Post: New Ideas: Separating The Chaff From The Grain http://bit.ly/fSVxVF [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bobbi Newman, Andy Burkhardt. Andy Burkhardt said: Blog Post: New Ideas: Separating The Chaff From The Grain <a href="http://bit.ly/fSVxVF" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/fSVxVF</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
